Strategy & Architecture
Honest, technically credible roadmaps for what to build, what to buy, and what to skip.
Book a Ship Audit →Leadership is under pressure to "do AI" while drowning in vendor pitches, and the last initiative burned a quarter before anyone could say whether it would ever ship. Most AI projects fail here, on the plan, not the model, betting budget on the wrong thing before the hard questions get asked. We give you a technically credible read on what's worth building, what to buy, and what to skip, so the budget lands on the initiatives that actually reach production.
- Opportunity and feasibility audits
- Target architecture for the AI system
- Build-vs-buy and vendor review
- ROI and cost modelling
- A phased roadmap with named risks
Everything below transfers to you at handover. No retainer, no lock-in.
- A written strategy and architecture document
- A prioritized, sequenced roadmap
- An ROI model you can defend internally
- A build-vs-buy / vendor recommendation
- A deck and document defensible to your board
You own every line.
Explicit handover terms, not fine print — this is what transfers to you when we're done.
- All source code transfers to you at handover.
- Infrastructure-as-code for the whole system transfers to you.
- The eval suite and tests transfer to you.
- Credentials and accounts we provision transfer to you.
- Documentation and runbooks transfer to you.
- No retainer required to keep it running.
- No kill-switch, no vendor lock-in — operate and extend it without us.
- A clear, sequenced plan instead of a scattered backlog of AI ideas
- Budget aimed at the initiatives that actually ship and pay off
- Dead-ends named before they cost you a quarter
- Model-agnostic recommendations you could execute with any competent team, including your own
- Alignment across leadership, engineering, and finance on one defensible plan
Questions, answered.
The questions we get asked most, answered plainly: no hedging, no marketing copy.
01 Will you tell us NOT to build something?
Yes, and we do it regularly. Our incentive is a credible recommendation, not a bigger build contract. Sometimes the right answer is to buy, wait, or do nothing yet.
02 How is this different from a big-consultancy deck?
We're hands-on engineers, not slide generalists. The roadmap reflects what's actually feasible to build and operate, shaped by people who ship this kind of system rather than present about it.
03 Do you lock us into a stack?
No. Recommendations are model-agnostic and favor open standards. The goal is a plan you could execute with any competent team, including your own.
04 What do we walk away with?
A written strategy and architecture document, a prioritized roadmap, an ROI model, and a build-vs-buy recommendation: concrete artifacts your board can act on, not a verbal readout.